Access review scope: what's in, what's out?
Not every user, not every system needs to be included in every review. Here's how to define your scope so it stays manageable — and defensible in an audit.
Defining review scope is the first step of the review process. Get it wrong here and you'll either drown in unnecessary work — or miss something critical.
\n \nPeople within scope
\n-
\n
- Active employees: always. \n
- Scheduled to start: not yet active, not in scope yet. \n
- Scheduled to leave: in scope — final check before departure. \n
- Inactive since the previous review: in scope one more time to verify that access has genuinely been revoked. \n
- Contractors and external parties: a separate review track with its own cadence (typically monthly). \n
Systems within scope
\n-
\n
- All tier-1 (critical) systems: always. \n
- Tier-2: included in every standard review. \n
- Tier-3 (nice-to-have SaaS): every six months, unless there is a specific reason to review sooner. \n
Document your scope decisions
\nRecord your scope policy in your ISMS. For each review, keep a scope snapshot that captures exactly what was included. This allows an auditor to compare across reviews and confirm that you are applying your scope consistently.
\n \nSee also: sample-based or full review, SaaS inventory.
Volledige gids: Revisiones de acceso periódicas: proceso, frecuencia y evidencia
Dit artikel is onderdeel van onze uitgebreide Access reviews-gids. Lees de pillar voor het complete plaatje.
Lees de pillar →