Bulk decisions in access reviews: faster without being careless
80% of the rows in a review are routine. You want to handle those in a single click. How do you do that without accidentally missing a critical row?
If you assess every row individually, a review takes 10 hours instead of 2. Bulk actions are the solution — as long as you use them responsibly.
\n\nWhat's suitable for bulk?
\n- \n
- Similar "keep" rows: for example, "everyone in role X has has_access on system Y — expected pattern." \n
- Role-drift clean-ups: everyone who, after a role change, has access that their new role doesn't cover. \n
- Inactive users: one click on "revoke all" for all has_access cells belonging to a person marked as inactive. \n
What should NEVER be bulk?
\n- \n
- Privileged access. Always one by one. \n
- Exceptions to role patterns. These are, by definition, the very reason a review exists. \n
- External parties. Context varies from person to person. \n
Safety mechanisms
\n- \n
- A bulk action shows a preview before it is applied. \n
- The log records that it was a bulk decision. \n
- An undo option within 1 hour is built in. \n
UI design that helps
\nA review tool should support: filter by role, filter by system, keyboard shortcuts (k/r/c), "select all" with a visible count. See how AccessGuard handles this.
\n\nSee also: review pillar, AI in reviews.
Volledige gids: Revisiones de acceso periódicas: proceso, frecuencia y evidencia
Dit artikel is onderdeel van onze uitgebreide Access reviews-gids. Lees de pillar voor het complete plaatje.
Lees de pillar →