BG Beter Geregeld ICT
Access reviews · 2 min leestijd · 20 December 2025

Evidence for access reviews: what to keep and where

A review without evidence is, as far as an auditor is concerned, a review that never happened. Here's what to retain, in what format, and for how long.

During an ISO audit, auditors ask for evidence. "We do reviews" is not enough — they want to see what happened, by whom, and when.

What to retain per review

  • Snapshot export: who had access to what at the time of the review.
  • Decision per row: keep/revoke/change, plus any justification provided.
  • Participants: who made which decisions.
  • Timeline: start, close, and execution of actions.
  • Execution: confirmation that revoke actions were actually carried out.
  • Final report: 2-page PDF with a summary, names, and signature.

Format

PDF is ideal for handing over to auditors. Many tools generate this automatically — see the AccessGuard demo for a sample report.

Retention period

At least 3 years for ISO purposes. In practice: retain for as long as you hold ISO certification plus 1 year.

Storage location

One central location in your wiki or document system, with an ACL restricted to "compliance team and management only". Not scattered across inboxes.

What auditors reject

  • Loose screenshots without context.
  • Reports with no date or names.
  • No traceable link between a decision and its execution.
  • A review date in the future ("scheduled for next week").

See also: pre-audit checklist, review pillar.

Onderwerpen

#access-review #audit #iso-27001 #bewijsvoering

Volledige gids: Revisiones de acceso periódicas: proceso, frecuencia y evidencia

Dit artikel is onderdeel van onze uitgebreide Access reviews-gids. Lees de pillar voor het complete plaatje.

Lees de pillar →